Continuum Concept: A Case Study
Continuum Concept: A Case Study
How the Continuum Concept is Applied Therapeutically
by Jim Giorgi
I have worked with very young children since 1982, as a psychological consultant to preschool programs. My job was to evaluate preschool-age children (between the ages of two and a half to 5 years) who were suspected by their parents, or pediatricians, or other early childhood intervention organizations, of having significant developmental delays.
Based upon the results of my evaluations, I would determine if the child was sufficiently delayed or disrupted in his or her intellectual, emotional or behavioral development to warrant placement in a special education preschool program. When my evaluation was complete, I wrote a report, shared the results with the child’s parents or guardians, and made recommendations as to what types of remedial interventions the child required.
During my years working for public school systems, I also provided psychotherapeutic interventions to those children who required such treatment once they were placed in those preschool programs. In the years since 1997, when I read the book The Continuum Concept by Jean Liedloff, the advice I have given to parents of children with significant emotional and behavioral disorders has derived from that theoretical premise.
(login to comment)
In 2005, I had a job working as a psychological consultant to a private Special Education Preschool program in upstate New York. One day, I was providing feedback to the foster mother of a boy I had just evaluated, who was referred to us by his pediatrician because he was having all sorts of disruptive behavioral problems. “Jordan” (not his real name) was two and a half years old and had a history of consistent neglect, abuse and disruptive elements in his history from birth. His birth mother was a substance abuser with a history of being abused herself, and a history of being in abusive relationships with various men. Without going into detail, to say that this boy’s home environment from birth and the treatment (or lack thereof) that he received from his mother and whatever partner she was with at the time were disastrous to normal development would be an understatement.
According to reports, Jordan was routinely left alone in his crib, unfed, unchanged and without human contact, for long periods of time. Jordan had been removed from his mother’s care by Child Protective Services almost a year prior to my meeting him, and placed in a succession of foster homes. All of the homes that Jordan was placed in previous to that of the current foster mother had requested that Jordan be removed because they were unable to tolerate his disruptive behaviors. “Rose”, (not her real name) the current foster mother reported that Jordan’s behavior in her home was extremely agitated, with many physical and verbal attention-seeking behaviors (which, miraculously, only rarely exhibited overt hostility and aggression), constant motion, and an inability to sleep through the night. She followed this description with an assurance that, despite his behaviors, both she and her husband saw him as a truly lovable boy, and were planning on initiating adoption procedures should the parental rights of the mother be terminated by Family Court, which seemed imminent. I marveled at this woman’s open-heartedness, emotional strength and common sense.
Based upon my knowledge of Continuum principles, I realized immediately that what Jordan needed, and was literally “screaming” for via his behavior, was the extended physical contact with the mother or other adult (father, grandparents, etc.) that he had lacked from birth. One of the situations Rose reported was that Jordan did not sleep well and usually got out of bed and went into the parents bedroom in the middle of the night. They would let him sleep with them for a while and when he was asleep carry him back to his own bed. If he didn’t sleep until morning, he would repeat that process. I suggested to Rose that she just allow him to remain in their bed and sleep with them instead of trying to make him sleep in his own bed . I saw that Jordan was sending a clear message to them which they were not understanding because their responses were based on conventional models of child rearing. I told Rose to just let Jordan know from the outset that from then on, he could sleep with them in their bed, that he would be welcome there whenever he wanted. I assured her that he would sleep more soundly, be more rested, and get the physical contact and emotional reassurance he needed to be able quickly to springboard to higher levels of independence and self-control. I told her that he would probably go back to his own bed of his own volition within about a month, if not less, and be happy to be there because it would be his way of telling them via his behavior that he is truly feeling like a “big boy” now.
I also encouraged Rose to allow Jordan to remain in as close physical proximity to her during the day as often as he wished. This meant, of course, giving and getting hugs and sitting in her lap at appropriate times. But more importantly, I emphasized that Rose should not stop whatever task she happened to be doing for more than a few moments to exchange hugs. Even more critical was just allowing Jordan to stay close to her or to be physically touching her (whenever possible) without her taking her attention off of the task in which she was engaged, whether it was cooking, cleaning, talking on the phone, or any other daily task. I encouraged her to allow Jordan to be a “passive participant” in all of her normal, adult routines, and to be “child friendly” without being “child centered”.
I reassured Rose that every child who feels that he has the physical contact that he really needs, and not what his parents give him as substitutes for that contact, wants to grow up and be more mature. If a child gets stuck at any point along the way of his development, it is because he feels that he hasn’t received all of the contact he really needed at that point to feel secure enough to leave less mature levels for more mature levels. I knew that Jordan, despite the severity of his troubles, was no different.
Sitting with and listening to me during this feedback session with Rose was the program’s special education evaluator, who had performed the academic portion of Jordan’s evaluation, and was poised to make a report on her findings as well. She heard all of my advice, and I could see the tension building up in her face. After I gave the advice about allowing Jordan to sleep in the parents’ bed, she said quietly “we don’t encourage that here”. I felt a flash of annoyance, but shrugged it off. I understood that she, too, just didn’t “get it”. She was about 30 years old, and with perhaps five to eight years of teaching experience. She certainly had been exposed only to the conventional theories of infantile attachment and child development. I made an offhanded remark about “special circumstances” to deflect her concerns. But her comments clearly showed me that there needs to be a massive educational initiative to change this attitude and show people what is really happening to a child when they hear him crying or see behavioral problems, and then mistakenly assume that feeding him, or changing his diapers, or making silly faces, or giving him toys or other distractions will satisfy his true needs.
The session ended after the special education teacher gave her feedback, and Rose left feeling both encouraged and empowered by the advice she received. She was committed to putting it into practice as soon as she got home. I went home that afternoon feeling gratified that the few minutes I spent with Rose might have made a positive difference in the lives of this family, people whom I would probably never see again.
About a week and a half later, I received a call from the preschool agency, asking me if I would consent to their giving my telephone number to the pediatrician who treated Jordan. Apparently the pediatrician had called the center and asked to speak with me. As I worked there only one day a week, I did not have my own extension or voicemail. I readily consented, and within 5 minutes of doing so received a call from the pediatrician, a female physician whose practice was in a town about 15 miles from where I lived. She informed me that she had seen Jordan for a regular checkup the day before and, as she put it, was presented with a “totally different child” than the one she had seen a few months before, during the visit which had initially prompted her to refer Jordan for the preschool evaluation. She went on to say that Jordan was “calm”, “happy”, “relaxed”, “attentive”, and, in short, exhibited none of the problematic behaviors that she had observed in previous meetings.
She was so stunned by this transformation (as she put it) that she asked Rose what could possibly have happened as a result of the evaluation that Jordan had undergone. When Rose described to her the advice that I had given, she felt compelled to contact me. The pediatrician continued, saying that she had always felt that physical contact with newborns was essential for appropriate development, but she had never heard of the Continuum Concept and how this principle confirmed her intuitions in ways that transcended conventional developmental and attachment theory. Most importantly, she affirmed that her “before and after” observations of Jordan’s behavior demonstrated unequivocally to her the validity of the Continuum Concept’s essential elements. She was truly dumbfounded by what she saw, and needed to speak with me personally to reassure herself that Jordan’s improved state was not just the effect of some random factor, or his just “growing out of it”. She mentioned that Rose reported that Jordan was now sleeping in his own bed of his own volition and sleeping peacefully for the entire night.
I spent probably half an hour discussing with the pediatrician both Jordan’s case and the Continuum Concept in general before she needed to end the call to see her next patient. We closed with her thanking me profusely and blessing me for “changing Jordan’s life”. I am still awed by Jordan’s transformation. I also realize that I, personally, did nothing to produce it. It was simply another confirmation of my conviction that no psychotherapist can ever be as effective in making a rapid, positive healing impact on a child’s damaged psyche as a parent who finally gives the child what it has been insatiably craving since infancy...the “full contact parenting” of Continuum treatment.
(login to comment)
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
2011





I want to share with you my story of The Gift of the Katana as a way to demonstrate what I am teaching you about the Power of Intention.
I have been very busy this last month making videos for "


I recently reminisced about the unusual tale of how I was awarded one of the most coveted symbols of advanced athletic prowess at Spellman-the varsity pin. My homeroom during freshman year was 1F, in room 108, and Brother Brian (Kelly) was our homeroom teacher (and also our Biology and Religion teacher as well). Those of you who remember me will recall that I was about as far from the athletic type as one could get. My elementary school, St. Benedict's, had no athletic program at all, and so for the first 8 years of my education, physical education of any kind was nonexistent. My parents were not "sports-minded" and did not encourage me to join local sports teams of any kind. So I had no experience with competitive sports. One activity I did enjoy through my youth, though, was swimming. When I got to Spellman in the Fall of 1967, I figured that it would be a good thing to "round out" my program by including some athletic activity, and since swimming was something that I had at least some familiarity with, I decided to join the Swimming Team.
An analogy can be made between meditative practice and a whitewater rafting excursion. Most people are familiar with scenes of the Grand Canyon. The Colorado River, which flows at its bottom, is as turbulent and dangerous a watercourse to navigate as any in the world. The river comprises stretches of incredibly dangerous, chaotic rapids punctuated at intervals by stretches of placid, pond-like areas on which one may lazily drift among awe-inspiring scenery.
In 2002, when I was working with a previous incarnation of the soap company in which I am now a partner, my business partner, Kaylin, mentioned to me that one of the customers of our nontoxic soap was the laboratory of the Language Research Center at Georgia State University in Atlanta. They were using our soap to clean the lab and living quarters of the Bonobo Chimpanzees with whom they were doing anthropological research in the development of language and speech in primates. One of the researchers, Holly, had heard of our soap and because it was so effective and yet still totally nontoxic, she wanted the safest product possible to use with the chimps in their living and working quarters. Kaylin told me that Holly had called to say that they were about to run out of soap and needed to order more. It happened that I was going to be driving to New York via Atlanta in a couple of days, and Kaylin suggested that I could drop off the soap directly to Holly instead of having it shipped up to her. I readily agreed.
I have a very dear friend who is a Kiwi. No, I don’t mean he’s a small, odd-looking flightless bird or a fuzzy, juicy green-fleshed fruit. Richard was born and raised in New Zealand. I met Richard during an extended trip to Maui in 1996, where he was studying to become a Feldenkrais (a form of bodywork) practitioner, and we have been friends since. At the time he was a professional musician, a tympanist (kettledrum player) in the Auckland Philharmonia. In 1998, the Philharmonia hired a new concertmaster, a French-Canadian violinist (and what a marvelous musician she is) from Montreal named Marcelle. Richard’s and Marcelle’s professional relationship in the orchestra grew into a friendship and very quickly from there they realized they were meant for each other.
The Lord’s Prayer is the perfect, complete statement of existence, of how the universe and all creation “is” and “works”. It may be understood in the following manner:
About a year and a half ago, during the early months of my giving dharma talks at the Buddha Center on Second Life (the online virtual world in which you may create a whole other “life” for yourself in cyberspace), one of the frequent participants at my talks was a Second Life avatar named “India Susa”. In conversations we had both during and after the dharma talks, I found her to be a very great-hearted, insightful, and compassionate lady, and always enjoyed our exchanges. After several months, she notified all of her Second Life friends that real-life responsibilities were requiring more time than they had previously, and decided that she needed to reduce drastically the amount of time she was spending online in her virtual identity. I missed her attendance at my talks and also our conversations, but feeling as I did that real-life is always the priority, I understood and endorsed her decision.
I was asked to comment on the prayer of that great Buddhist teacher St. Francis, and this prayer which I say every morning. I would add this line in this prayer : "and it is in gratefulness that we are gifted in every moment."
As a Shodan (First Degree Black Belt), I came to personally understand the anecdote that states that when you become a black belt you are ready to truly begin to learn Aikido . My training has been enhanced greatly with the addition of principles from the Daito Ryu Aikijujitsu system. Sensei Todd González introduced me to the principles of small circle leading and recently Sensei Jim Giorgi who legitimized these principles as having a valid home in Nihon Goshin Aikido. 


I recently sent a copy of Between Yesterday and Tomorrow to a dear friend who is a wonderful spiritual teacher in the Siddha Yoga lineage. He agreed to review the book and sent me the following comment referring to a sentence I had written in one of the chapters of the book (dealing with the Continuum Concept). The sentence he commented on reads as follows:
At a recent meeting of the Integral Spirituality group that I host, I read the chapter on "Love, Relationships, Sex and Compassion from my book Between Yesterday and Tomorrow. In one paragraph, I referred to a quote from a spiritual teacher that was related to me by Stewart Emery (creator of the Actualizations workshop) in 1983. Although Stewart gave the source of the quote at the time, my memory is vague about the source. I have an intuition that it was Swami Muktananda, but I am not completely sure.
My student, Kate, had something to share with me recently. She wanted to discuss a passage she read in a novel that resonanted with her and she wanted to get my perspective on it. We also talked briefly about her personal experiences and I agreed with her that it was not only a powerful passage in the novel but that her vantage point after personal experience was sound.
“The Messiah will come only when he is no longer necessary; he will come only on the day after his arrival; he will come, not on the last day, but on the very last.” ~ Franz Kafka, Parables and Paradoxes
My student Kate has been working with me not only on the mat in Integral Aikido but with EFT. She's been working on building her own Integral Transformative Path before we met through some intellectual and spiritual pursuits. One of the things that she's finding on her personal path is happiness through writing and she often shares pieces with me that involve our work together.
John Begue, one of the students at the Port Allen NGA dojo who studies under Sensei Troy Maranto, saw this question on the System of Strategy Facebook page of James Williams, Sensei. From reading my books, John knew that I had some knowledge in this area of interest and referred the question to me for my opinion. Below I have reproduced the exchange as it took place on the System of Strategy page on Facebook over the past few days.
One of my students posed some questions to me recently regarding moving on from toxic relationships. Moving out of the relationship to a place of healing is challenging, often dishearteningly so in the beginning stages. Working through the emotional pain is an individual path but there are some powerful tools to be found in mindfulness, meditation and EFT. Moving on from any negative, emotionally charged situation takes time and work to heal. The important point to remember is to be mindful of triggers that bring unnecessarily negative emotions so that you can continue your path to break the attachment and the hold over your daily life. What follows here is our email conversation addressing the challenges presented after the dissolution of a relationship: